posted by
askye at 11:10am on 21/08/2020
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I'm up to episode 6. I realize there aren't many left. It's holding my attention more than most shows. Lately I've struggled to get through a whole hour of tv in one sitting. I still play Merge Dragons too much when I'm watching the Witcher but I pay more attention to what is going on. It's a very beautiful show to watch and there are usually little things to watch for. Like when the doppleganger is at the forest and you can see the outside and the snow.
I got The Last Wish from the library and read through the first chapters.. stories.. I guess in it. The first 2. Anyway they are quite different from who it is in the show but I'm still trying to figure it all out. I saw a youtube video about how the show is a terrible, terrible adaption of the book and I haven't watched all of that because I hadn't gotten to some of what he was talking about on the show or in the book to compare. But I have issues with what I did see. First the guy talks about how things are left out in adaptions and it's often necessary but certain things aren't and every word in a well written story is needed and The Witcher is well written so that everything should have ended up in the show. I admit there is some stuff I don't know because I'm not familiar but it's not keeping me from enjoying it or getting the gist of it. The time shift thing, once I figured it out and went back and watched the first episode there are indications. Like there is the scene in Cintra where Calanthe and Eist are talking about the invasion and Calanthe is trying to spare Ciri "she's a child" and Ciri pops up with you won you first battle when you were my age. Then we flip to the forest and Geralt and Renfri and she's talking about what Stergabor did to her and how Queen Calanthe just won her first battle.
Now I didn't catch that the first time I watched but the second time (after I figured out about the time jump) I caught it.
Anyway, this was written with the idea that you know the source material and I don't have a problem with that. It does mean some things are left out and the characterizations aren't going to be true to the books or games as much (I assume) but I've also seen things that have way too much exposition or spend too much time spoon feeding information so everyone is caught up and I would rather have to think and pay attention than have to sit through exposition to explain something that's been clear but we still have to wait until every little bit is spelled out and there's no mystery.
I got The Last Wish from the library and read through the first chapters.. stories.. I guess in it. The first 2. Anyway they are quite different from who it is in the show but I'm still trying to figure it all out. I saw a youtube video about how the show is a terrible, terrible adaption of the book and I haven't watched all of that because I hadn't gotten to some of what he was talking about on the show or in the book to compare. But I have issues with what I did see. First the guy talks about how things are left out in adaptions and it's often necessary but certain things aren't and every word in a well written story is needed and The Witcher is well written so that everything should have ended up in the show. I admit there is some stuff I don't know because I'm not familiar but it's not keeping me from enjoying it or getting the gist of it. The time shift thing, once I figured it out and went back and watched the first episode there are indications. Like there is the scene in Cintra where Calanthe and Eist are talking about the invasion and Calanthe is trying to spare Ciri "she's a child" and Ciri pops up with you won you first battle when you were my age. Then we flip to the forest and Geralt and Renfri and she's talking about what Stergabor did to her and how Queen Calanthe just won her first battle.
Now I didn't catch that the first time I watched but the second time (after I figured out about the time jump) I caught it.
Anyway, this was written with the idea that you know the source material and I don't have a problem with that. It does mean some things are left out and the characterizations aren't going to be true to the books or games as much (I assume) but I've also seen things that have way too much exposition or spend too much time spoon feeding information so everyone is caught up and I would rather have to think and pay attention than have to sit through exposition to explain something that's been clear but we still have to wait until every little bit is spelled out and there's no mystery.
There are no comments on this entry. (Reply.)